International Harvester 464 or J.I. Case 610-B?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester 464: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
- The International Harvester 464 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm and an independent PTO.
- The International Harvester 464 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 298% (34.0 L/min / 9.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The International Harvester 464 suits road haulage better on this data: 44% (11.0 km/h / 6.8 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 464 | 610-B | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 31.1 kW (41.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 30.7 kW (41.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 464 and the 610-B. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 464 and the 610-B. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 11.4 L/min (3.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | AheadThe International Harvester 464 has 298% more hydraulic flow (34.0 L/min / 9.0 gpm) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 610-B. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,327 kg (5,130 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 1,818 kg (4,008 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 464 is 28% heavier (509 kg / 1,122 lb) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 464 and the 610-B. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 464 and the 610-B. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 36 km/h (22.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | AheadThe International Harvester 464 has 44% more top speed (11.0 km/h / 6.8 mph) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | AheadThe International Harvester 464 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 610-B does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | AheadThe International Harvester 464 has an independent PTO; the J.I. Case 610-B’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 464” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1978 | 1958–1959 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 464 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 464 has 298% more hydraulic flow (34.0 L/min / 9.0 gpm) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 464 is 28% heavier (509 kg / 1,122 lb) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 464 has 44% more top speed (11.0 km/h / 6.8 mph) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 464 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 610-B does not (as stated by the sources).
- The International Harvester 464 has an independent PTO; the J.I. Case 610-B’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- The International Harvester 464 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources