International Harvester 444 or UZINA TRACTORUL R-450 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester 444: hydraulic flow.

  • The International Harvester 444 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 25% (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 444 and UZINA TRACTORUL R-450 (DT), with the call on each
Question444R-450 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?27.1 kW (36.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”27.1 kW (36.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 444 and the R-450 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 444 and the R-450 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.3 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”AheadThe International Harvester 444 has 25% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the UZINA TRACTORUL R-450 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 444.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,873 kg (4,129 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 444 and the R-450 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 444 and the R-450 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-450 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 444”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB 450 (DT)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1972–19771974–1981EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 444 has 25% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the UZINA TRACTORUL R-450 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources