International Harvester 364 or URSUS 2812?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 364 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester 364 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 45% (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 364 | 2812 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 26.5 kW (35.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 364 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 364 and the 2812. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 364 and the 2812. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 27.3 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 18.8 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe International Harvester 364 has 45% more hydraulic flow (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the URSUS 2812 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,366 kg (3,012 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 364. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,791 kg (3,948 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 2,020 kg (4,453 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 2812 is 13% heavier (229 kg / 505 lb) than the International Harvester 364 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 364 and the 2812. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 364 and the 2812. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2812. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 364” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1977 | 1988–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 2812 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 364 has 45% more hydraulic flow (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the URSUS 2812 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 2812 is 13% heavier (229 kg / 505 lb) than the International Harvester 364 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 2812 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 364 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources