International Harvester 1455 XL or Renault 155-54 TX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1455 XL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester 1455 XL suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 1455 XL and Renault 155-54 TX, with the call on each
Question1455 XL155-54 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?107 kW (143 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1455 XL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1455 XL and the 155-54 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1455 XL and the 155-54 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.0 L/min (13.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”43.1 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”AheadThe International Harvester 1455 XL has 16% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Renault 155-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,955 kg (13,129 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 1455 XL: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”); the 155-54 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,420 kg (14,154 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”6,750 kg (14,881 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1455 XL.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1455 XL and the 155-54 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 155-54 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19961989–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 1455 XL has 16% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Renault 155-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 155-54 TX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1455 XL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 155-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 1455 XL: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1455XL”); the 155-54 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 155-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7952”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources