International Harvester 1086 or International Harvester 5088?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1086 | 5088 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.7 kW (133.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | 101.5 kW (136.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1086 and the 5088. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1086 and the 5088. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 5088. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,335 kg (7,352 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | 3,170.000 kg (6,989 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,772 kg (12,725 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | 7,262 kg (16,010 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 5088 is 26% heavier (1,490 kg / 3,285 lb) than the International Harvester 1086 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1086 and the 5088. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1086 and the 5088. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1086 and the 5088. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 1086” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 5088” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1979 | 1981–1985 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 5088 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 5088 is 26% heavier (1,490 kg / 3,285 lb) than the International Harvester 1086 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 5088 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources