International Harvester Farmall M/MV vs Volvo T-36

13 material differences

Tractor one

1939–1952

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1952–1959

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Farmall M/MV and the T-36 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 0 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester Farmall M/MV and Volvo T-36, field by field
Field	Farmall M/MV	T-36	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	36.5 hp	42.0 hp	+15% T-36
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-248	VOLVO 1053	differs
Displacement declared	4.06 L	3.36 L	+21% Farmall M/MV
Maximum torque declared	—	152 lb·ft · 206 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	16.2 mph · 26 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+15% T-36
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry Rockford single-plate clutch type 11 inches	pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	6.3 gpm · 23.8 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	1,276 psi · 88 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	1,874 lb · 850 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	537 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,910 lb · 2,227 kg	5,401 lb · 2,450 kg	+10% T-36
Wheelbase declared	88.7 in · 2,254 mm	79.1 in · 2,010 mm	+12% Farmall M/MV
Length declared	133.1 in · 3,381 mm	124.0 in · 3,150 mm	+7% Farmall M/MV
Width declared	84.5 in · 2,146 mm	66.5 in · 1,690 mm	+27% Farmall M/MV
Height declared	78.3 in · 1,988 mm	85.8 in · 2,180 mm	+10% T-36
Ground clearance declared	25.5 in · 648 mm	21.1 in · 535 mm	+21% Farmall M/MV
Turning radius, braked declared	6.8 ft · 2.08 m	11.7 ft · 3.57 m	+72% T-36
Fuel tank declared	84.0 qt · 79.5 L	68.7 qt · 65.0 L	+22% Farmall M/MV

Source

Source