International Harvester Farmall 656 or SOMECA 670 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmall 656 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 670 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester Farmall 656 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 96% (22.3 L/min / 5.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The SOMECA 670 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester Farmall 656 and SOMECA 670 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionFarmall 656670 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmall 656 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 670 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmall 656 and the 670 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmall 656 and the 670 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”23.2 L/min (6.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”AheadThe International Harvester Farmall 656 has 96% more hydraulic flow (22.3 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the SOMECA 670 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,510 kg (5,534 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmall 656.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,835 kg (6,250 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”2,740 kg (6,041 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmall 656 and the 670 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”7 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester Farmall 656 is stepless (CVT) and the SOMECA 670 (DT) has 7 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmall 656 and the 670 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 34 km/h (21.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”AheadThe International Harvester Farmall 656 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 670 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”AheadThe SOMECA 670 (DT) has an independent PTO; the International Harvester Farmall 656’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 656”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 670”AheadThe SOMECA 670 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Farmall 656 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1965–19721968–1971EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester Farmall 656 has 96% more hydraulic flow (22.3 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the SOMECA 670 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester Farmall 656 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 670 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The SOMECA 670 (DT) has an independent PTO; the International Harvester Farmall 656’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
  • The SOMECA 670 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Farmall 656 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester Farmall 656 is stepless (CVT) and the SOMECA 670 (DT) has 7 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmall 656 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 670 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources