International Harvester Farmall 30 vs Lanz D 8539
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (73%). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Farmall 30 | D 8539 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 30.6 hp | 29.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER 284 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 4.65 L | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 3.7 mph · 6.0 km/h | 13.4 mph · 21.5 km/h | +258% D 8539 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry ROCKFORD single-plate clutch | pedal-operated three-jaw clutch with clutch brake | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 534 rpm | — | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,300 lb · 2,404 kg | 9,149 lb · 4,150 kg | +73% D 8539 |
| Wheelbase declared | 94.0 in · 2,388 mm | 76.4–77.8 in · 1,940–1,975 mm | differs |
| Length declared | 147.0 in · 3,734 mm | 129.9 in · 3,300 mm | +13% Farmall 30 |
| Width declared | 89.3 in · 2,267 mm | 70.9 in · 1,800 mm | +26% Farmall 30 |
| Height declared | 81.0 in · 2,057 mm | 92.1 in · 2,340 mm | +14% D 8539 |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 9.4–10.6 in · 240–270 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.5 ft · 2.59 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | — | 95.1–100.4 qt · 90–95 L | — |
International Harvester Farmall 30 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-30”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 10-20”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall F-30”
Lanz D 8539 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 8539”