International Harvester F-267 D or Renault N 71?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the F-267 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the N 71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault N 71 suits road haulage better on this data: 32% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | F-267 D | N 71 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 25.4 kW (34.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F-267 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the N 71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F-267 D and the N 71. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F-267 D and the N 71. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 18.6 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 17.0 L/min (4.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the F-267 D and the N 71. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,875 kg (4,134 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 1,615 kg (3,560 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester F-267 D is 16% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Renault N 71 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the F-267 D and the N 71. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F-267 D and the N 71. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19 km/h (11.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | AheadThe Renault N 71 has 32% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the International Harvester F-267 D (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 549 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the F-267 D. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | AheadThe International Harvester F-267 D has an independent PTO; the Renault N 71’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-267 D” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1961 | 1960–1963 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester F-267 D is 16% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Renault N 71 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault N 71 has 32% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the International Harvester F-267 D (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester F-267 D has an independent PTO; the Renault N 71’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F-267 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the N 71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources