International Harvester D-436 or J.I. Case 531?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 531: hydraulic flow.

  • The J.I. Case 531 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 47% (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester D-436 and J.I. Case 531, with the call on each
QuestionD-436531Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?27.1 kW (36.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”27.2 kW (36.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-436 and the 531.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-436 and the 531.
Which pumps more oil for implements?24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”35.2 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 531”AheadThe J.I. Case 531 has 47% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the International Harvester D-436 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D-436 and the 531.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,748 kg (3,854 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”1,867 kg (4,116 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-436 and the 531.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-436 and the 531.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-436 Standard”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 531”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1959–19621960–1969EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 531 has 47% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the International Harvester D-436 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources