International Harvester D-215 or International Harvester Super-CUB?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-215 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super-CUB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester D-215 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 84% (8.9 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The International Harvester D-215 suits road haulage better on this data: 46% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester D-215 and International Harvester Super-CUB, with the call on each
QuestionD-215Super-CUBCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?11 kW (15 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”10.3 kW (13.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-215 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super-CUB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-215 and the Super-CUB.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-215 and the Super-CUB.
Which pumps more oil for implements?19.5 L/min (5.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”10.6 L/min (2.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”AheadThe International Harvester D-215 has 84% more hydraulic flow (8.9 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?300 kg (661 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Super-CUB.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,188 kg (2,619 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”649 kg (1,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester D-215 is 83% heavier (539 kg / 1,188 lb) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,950 kg (4,299 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Super-CUB.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”3Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”AheadThe International Harvester D-215 has 100% more forward gears (3 gears) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Super-CUB.
Which is faster on the road?19 km/h (11.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”13 km/h (8.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”AheadThe International Harvester D-215 has 46% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”475 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Super-CUB.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super-CUB.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-215”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super Cub”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1962–19641958–1962EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester D-215 has 84% more hydraulic flow (8.9 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester D-215 is 83% heavier (539 kg / 1,188 lb) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester D-215 has 100% more forward gears (3 gears) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester D-215 has 46% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the International Harvester Super-CUB (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-215 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super-CUB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources