International Harvester 353 vs Massey Ferguson MF 230
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 353 and the MF 230 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 353 | MF 230 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 34 hp | 41.4 hp | +24% MF 230 |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL-HARVESTER D-155 | Perkins AD 3.152 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.54 L | 2.50 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 108 lb·ft · 146 N·m | 127 lb·ft · 173 N·m | +18% MF 230 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +25% MF 230 |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 6.9 gpm · 26.2 L/min | 4.5 gpm · 17.0 L/min | +54% 353 |
| Pressure declared | 3,553 psi · 245 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 3,120 lb · 1,415 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,577 lb · 2,076 kg | 3,814 lb · 1,730 kg | +20% 353 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 7,584 lb · 3,440 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 77.4 in · 1,965 mm | 74.6 in · 1,896 mm | — |
| Length declared | 133.5 in · 3,390 mm | 124.8 in · 3,170 mm | +7% 353 |
| Width declared | 59.2 in · 1,504 mm | 64.2 in · 1,630 mm | +8% MF 230 |
| Height declared | 85.8 in · 2,180 mm | 83.5 in · 2,120 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 14.6 in · 372 mm | 12.2 in · 310 mm | +20% 353 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.9 ft · 3.02 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 63.4 qt · 60.0 L | 50.7 qt · 48 L | +25% 353 |
International Harvester 353 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 353”
Massey Ferguson MF 230 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 148”