International Harvester 3488-Hydro or SAME Buffalo 130 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester 3488-Hydro: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.
- The International Harvester 3488-Hydro suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 95% (33.1 L/min / 8.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The International Harvester 3488-Hydro suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 3488-Hydro | Buffalo 130 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 79.9 kW (107.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | 80.2 kW (107.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3488-Hydro and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3488-Hydro and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 68.1 L/min (18.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | AheadThe International Harvester 3488-Hydro has 95% more hydraulic flow (33.1 L/min / 8.7 gpm) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 4,568 kg (10,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 3488-Hydro. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,842 kg (12,879 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 3488-Hydro is 36% heavier (1,542 kg / 3,400 lb) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3488-Hydro and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | 12 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester 3488-Hydro is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) has 12 to 24 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3488-Hydro and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | AheadThe International Harvester 3488-Hydro has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 3488-Hydro. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 3488 Hydro” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1981–1985 | 1978–1982 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 3488-Hydro has 95% more hydraulic flow (33.1 L/min / 8.7 gpm) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 3488-Hydro is 36% heavier (1,542 kg / 3,400 lb) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 3488-Hydro has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester 3488-Hydro is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) has 12 to 24 forward gears — not called.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources