International Harvester 323 vs Steyr 188

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

International Harvester 323

1966–1974

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Steyr 188

1960–1966

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 323 and the 188 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester 323 and Steyr 188, field by field
Field323188Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed25.6 hp27.6 hp+8% 188
Engine declaredINTERNATIONAL-HARVESTER DD-111Steyr WD-209differs
Displacement declared1.83 L1.99 L+9% 188
Maximum torque declared80 lb·ft · 109 N·m87 lb·ft · 118 N·m+8% 188
Transmission
Top speed declared12.4 mph · 20 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/h+50% 188
Clutch declaredPedal operated dry Fichtel and Sachs single disc clutchPedal-operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single-disc clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared6.6 gpm · 25.0 L/min
Pressure declared3,553 psi · 245 bar2,134 psi · 147 bar+67% 323
Three-point lift at ends declared2,425 lb · 1,100 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared4,136 lb · 1,876 kg3,064 lb · 1,390 kg+35% 323
Wheelbase declared71.5 in · 1,815 mm72.8 in · 1,850 mm
Length declared124.6 in · 3,165 mm124.4 in · 3,160 mm
Width declared64.6 in · 1,642 mm64.7 in · 1,644 mm
Height declared56.5 in · 1,434 mm57.1 in · 1,450 mm
Ground clearance declared14.3 in · 363 mm17.3 in · 440 mm+21% 188
Turning radius, braked declared9.4 ft · 2.85 m9.7 ft · 2.95 m
Fuel tank declared63.4 qt · 60.0 L42.3 qt · 40 L+50% 323

International Harvester 323 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-324 Farmall”

Steyr 188 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”