IMT 569 De Luxe or Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 569 De Luxe and Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A), with the call on each
Question569 De LuxeMF 363 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37.4 kW (50.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 569 De Luxe and the MF 363 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 569 De Luxe and the MF 363 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?15.0 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 363 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,530 kg (5,578 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 569 De Luxe is 19% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 569 De Luxe and the MF 363 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 569 De Luxe.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 569 De Luxe does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 569 De Luxe and the MF 363 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 569”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19961987–1994EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The IMT 569 De Luxe is 19% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 569 De Luxe does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources