IMT 569 De Luxe or John Deere 1140 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the John Deere 1140 (A): hydraulic flow.
- The John Deere 1140 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 213% (32.0 L/min / 8.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 569 De Luxe | 1140 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 37.4 kW (50.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 37.0 kW (49.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 569 De Luxe and the 1140 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 569 De Luxe and the 1140 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 15.0 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | AheadThe John Deere 1140 (A) has 213% more hydraulic flow (32.0 L/min / 8.5 gpm) than the IMT 569 De Luxe (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,530 kg (5,578 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 2,535 kg (5,589 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 569 De Luxe is 13% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the John Deere 1140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 569 De Luxe. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 569 De Luxe and the 1140 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 569 De Luxe. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 569” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1996 | 1979–1986 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 569 De Luxe is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 1140 (A) has 213% more hydraulic flow (32.0 L/min / 8.5 gpm) than the IMT 569 De Luxe (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The IMT 569 De Luxe is 13% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the John Deere 1140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The IMT 569 De Luxe is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources