IMT 588 or VOLVO-BM T 430?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VOLVO-BM T 430: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears, top speed and PTO speeds.

  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 119% (17.9 L/min / 4.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 588 and VOLVO-BM T 430, with the call on each
Question588T 430Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?32.2 kW (43.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”32.2 kW (43.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 588 and the T 430.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 588 and the T 430.
Which pumps more oil for implements?15.1 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”33.0 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 430 has 119% more hydraulic flow (17.9 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the IMT 588 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,120 kg (2,469 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 430.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”2,398 kg (5,287 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 588 and the T 430.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 430 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 588 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 588 and the T 430.
Which is faster on the road?22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 430 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the IMT 588 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 430 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 588 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 588 and the T 430.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1970–19801969–1978EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 has 119% more hydraulic flow (17.9 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the IMT 588 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 588 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the IMT 588 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 588 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources