IMT 545 De Luxe or ZETOR 4911?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the ZETOR 4911 is ahead on hydraulic flow and PTO speeds; the IMT 545 De Luxe is ahead on three-point lift.

  • The ZETOR 4911 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 545 De Luxe and ZETOR 4911, with the call on each
Question545 De Luxe4911Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?29.3 kW (39.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”29.1 kW (39.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 545 De Luxe and the 4911.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 545 De Luxe and the 4911.
Which pumps more oil for implements?15.8 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”24.8 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”AheadThe ZETOR 4911 has 57% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the IMT 545 De Luxe (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,438 kg (3,170 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”1,195 kg (2,635 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”AheadThe IMT 545 De Luxe has 20% more lift (243 kg / 536 lb) than the ZETOR 4911 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,225 kg (4,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”2,170 kg (4,784 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 545 De Luxe and the 4911.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 545 De Luxe and the 4911.
Which is faster on the road?26 km/h (16.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”AheadThe ZETOR 4911 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 545 De Luxe does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 545 De Luxe and the 4911.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 545”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19961977–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 545 De Luxe is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 4911 has 57% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the IMT 545 De Luxe (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The IMT 545 De Luxe has 20% more lift (243 kg / 536 lb) than the ZETOR 4911 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 4911 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 545 De Luxe does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The IMT 545 De Luxe is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources