IMT 542 or Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the IMT 542 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Massey Ferguson 253 (A) is ahead on three-point lift and drive.

  • The Massey Ferguson 253 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 20% (356 kg / 785 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 542 and Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A), with the call on each
Question542MF 253 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.7 kW (33.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”24.9 kW (33.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 542 and the MF 253 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 542 and the MF 253 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?18.5 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”13.3 L/min (3.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”AheadThe IMT 542 has 39% more hydraulic flow (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 253 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,407 kg (3,102 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”1,610 kg (3,549 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 253 (A) has 14% more lift (203 kg / 448 lb) than the IMT 542 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,815 kg (4,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”2,171 kg (4,786 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 253 (A) is 20% heavier (356 kg / 785 lb) than the IMT 542 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 542 and the MF 253 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 542 and the MF 253 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 542”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 253 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 542 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–1983–1987EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The IMT 542 has 39% more hydraulic flow (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 253 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 253 (A) has 14% more lift (203 kg / 448 lb) than the IMT 542 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 253 (A) is 20% heavier (356 kg / 785 lb) than the IMT 542 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 253 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 542 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources