IMT 540 or SAME Aurora 45 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME Aurora 45 (DT): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on drive.

  • The SAME Aurora 45 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (2.2 L/min / 0.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The SAME Aurora 45 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 540 and SAME Aurora 45 (DT), with the call on each
Question540Aurora 45 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.7 kW (33.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”24.6 kW (32.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 540 and the Aurora 45 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 540 and the Aurora 45 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?14.3 L/min (3.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”16.5 L/min (4.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”AheadThe SAME Aurora 45 (DT) has 15% more hydraulic flow (2.2 L/min / 0.6 gpm) than the IMT 540 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,405 kg (3,097 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”1,400 kg (3,086 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,790 kg (3,946 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”1,630 kg (3,594 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 540 and the Aurora 45 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”9Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 540 and the Aurora 45 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Aurora 45 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Aurora 45”AheadThe SAME Aurora 45 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 540 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1975–19861971–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Aurora 45 (DT) has 15% more hydraulic flow (2.2 L/min / 0.6 gpm) than the IMT 540 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Aurora 45 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 540 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources