IMT 540 or Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A): three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed and drive.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (205 kg / 452 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 21% (381 kg / 840 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 540 and Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A), with the call on each
Question540MF 253 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.7 kW (33.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”24.9 kW (33.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 540 and the MF 253 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 540 and the MF 253 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?14.3 L/min (3.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”13.3 L/min (3.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,405 kg (3,097 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”1,610 kg (3,549 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) has 15% more lift (205 kg / 452 lb) than the IMT 540 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,790 kg (3,946 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”2,171 kg (4,786 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) is 21% heavier (381 kg / 840 lb) than the IMT 540 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 540 and the MF 253 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 540 and the MF 253 (A).
Which is faster on the road?24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the IMT 540 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 540”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 253”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 540 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1975–19861983–1987Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) has 15% more lift (205 kg / 452 lb) than the IMT 540 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) is 21% heavier (381 kg / 840 lb) than the IMT 540 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the IMT 540 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 540 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 253 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources