IMT 533 or Renault D 35?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 533 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 35 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 533 and Renault D 35, with the call on each
Question533D 35Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”25.8 kW (34.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 533 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 35 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 533 and the D 35.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 533 and the D 35.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—13.0 L/min (3.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 533.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?817 kg (1,801 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 533: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”); the D 35: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,440 kg (3,175 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”1,623 kg (3,578 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault D 35 is 13% heavier (183 kg / 403 lb) than the IMT 533 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 533 and the D 35.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 533 and the D 35.
Which is faster on the road?23 km/h (14.3 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 533 and the D 35.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1959–19881956–1960EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault D 35 is 13% heavier (183 kg / 403 lb) than the IMT 533 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 533 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 35 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 533: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”); the D 35: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault D35 R7050”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources