IMT 5130/5136 or Renault 145-14 TX?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 5130/5136 and Renault 145-14 TX, with the call on each
Question5130/5136145-14 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?84.2 kW (112.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”84.1 kW (112.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5130/5136 and the 145-14 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5130/5136 and the 145-14 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.8 L/min (10.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 5130/5136.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,315 kg (11,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”6,170 kg (13,603 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-14 TX is 16% heavier (855 kg / 1,885 lb) than the IMT 5130/5136 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5130/5136 and the 145-14 TX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5130/5136 and the 145-14 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5130/5136”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19921981–1986EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 145-14 TX is 16% heavier (855 kg / 1,885 lb) than the IMT 5130/5136 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources