IMT 5100/5106 or SAME Buffalo DT?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the IMT 5100/5106: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed.
- The IMT 5100/5106 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 21% (630 kg / 1,389 lb) more three-point lift.
- The IMT 5100/5106 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5100/5106 | Buffalo DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 68.9 kW (92.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 69.9 kW (94 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5100/5106 and the Buffalo DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5100/5106 and the Buffalo DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | AheadThe IMT 5100/5106 has 30% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | AheadThe IMT 5100/5106 has 21% more lift (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,070 kg (11,177 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 4,320 kg (9,524 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 5100/5106 is 17% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5100/5106 and the Buffalo DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5100/5106 and the Buffalo DT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | AheadThe IMT 5100/5106 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1992 | 1968–1974 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 5100/5106 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The IMT 5100/5106 has 30% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The IMT 5100/5106 has 21% more lift (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The IMT 5100/5106 is 17% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The IMT 5100/5106 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME Buffalo DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The IMT 5100/5106 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources