IMT 5100/5106 or Renault 110-14 TS?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 110-14 TS: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.
- The Renault 110-14 TS suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (4.4 L/min / 1.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 100% (3,630 kg / 8,003 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5100/5106 | 110-14 TS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 68.9 kW (92.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 68.2 kW (91.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5100/5106 and the 110-14 TS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5100/5106 and the 110-14 TS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 43.4 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | AheadThe Renault 110-14 TS has 11% more hydraulic flow (4.4 L/min / 1.2 gpm) than the IMT 5100/5106 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 7,260 kg (16,006 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | AheadThe Renault 110-14 TS has 100% more lift (3,630 kg / 8,003 lb) than the IMT 5100/5106 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,070 kg (11,177 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5100/5106. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | AheadThe Renault 110-14 TS has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the IMT 5100/5106 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5100/5106 and the 110-14 TS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 5100/5106” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1992 | 1986–1989 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 110-14 TS has 11% more hydraulic flow (4.4 L/min / 1.2 gpm) than the IMT 5100/5106 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 110-14 TS has 100% more lift (3,630 kg / 8,003 lb) than the IMT 5100/5106 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 110-14 TS has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the IMT 5100/5106 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources