IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 or UTB 445 DTC?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47: hydraulic flow. On features, the UTB 445 DTC is ahead on drive.
- The IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (4.2 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The UTB 445 DTC suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | R-47 | 445 DTC | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 27.6 kW (37.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 27.2 kW (36.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-47 and the 445 DTC. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-47 and the 445 DTC. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | AheadThe IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 has 19% more hydraulic flow (4.2 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the UTB 445 DTC (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,387 kg (3,058 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 1,450 kg (3,197 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,085 kg (4,597 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-47 and the 445 DTC. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-47 and the 445 DTC. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 445 DTC. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 445 DT” | AheadThe UTB 445 DTC is available with four-wheel drive; the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1994 | 1974–1981 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 has 19% more hydraulic flow (4.2 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the UTB 445 DTC (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The UTB 445 DTC is available with four-wheel drive; the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources