IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 or Massey Ferguson MF 235 S?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 235 S: three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 235 S suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 32% (443 kg / 977 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 and Massey Ferguson MF 235 S, with the call on each
QuestionR-47MF 235 SCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?27.6 kW (37.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”27.2 kW (36.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-47 and the MF 235 S.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-47 and the MF 235 S.
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”25 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,387 kg (3,058 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”1,830 kg (4,034 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 235 S has 32% more lift (443 kg / 977 lb) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,085 kg (4,597 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”2,180 kg (4,806 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-47 and the MF 235 S.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 235 S has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-47 and the MF 235 S.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 47”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 235 S”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19941983–1985EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 235 S has 32% more lift (443 kg / 977 lb) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 235 S has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-47 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources