IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard or Renault 85-12 TX?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 85-12 TX: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.

  • The Renault 85-12 TX suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Renault 85-12 TX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 65% (1,510 kg / 3,329 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard and Renault 85-12 TX, with the call on each
QuestionR-76 Standard85-12 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.9 kW (64.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”48.0 kW (64.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-76 Standard and the 85-12 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-76 Standard and the 85-12 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?29.9 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”AheadThe Renault 85-12 TX has 38% more hydraulic flow (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,315 kg (5,104 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”3,825 kg (8,433 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”AheadThe Renault 85-12 TX has 65% more lift (1,510 kg / 3,329 lb) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,265 kg (4,993 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”3,405 kg (7,507 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 85-12 TX is 50% heavier (1,140 kg / 2,513 lb) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-76 Standard and the 85-12 TX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”AheadThe Renault 85-12 TX has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-76 Standard and the 85-12 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”AheadThe Renault 85-12 TX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 85-12 TX.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Rakovica R 76”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-12 TS/TX R7761”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19891986–1989Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 85-12 TX is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 85-12 TX has 38% more hydraulic flow (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 85-12 TX has 65% more lift (1,510 kg / 3,329 lb) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 85-12 TX is 50% heavier (1,140 kg / 2,513 lb) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 85-12 TX has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 85-12 TX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMR-RAKOVICA R-76 Standard does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 85-12 TX is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources