Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo or New Holland TM 125 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the XT 910.6 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TM 125 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 141% (68.4 L/min / 18.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The New Holland TM 125 suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo and New Holland TM 125 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
QuestionXT 910.6 TurboTM 125Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?84.5 kW (113.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XT 910.6 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XT 910.6 Turbo and the TM 125.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XT 910.6 Turbo and the TM 125.
Which pumps more oil for implements?48.5 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”116.9 L/min (30.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”AheadThe New Holland TM 125 has 141% more hydraulic flow (68.4 L/min / 18.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,772 kg (10,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”6,560 kg (14,462 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.6 Turbo: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”); the TM 125: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,680 kg (10,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”5,337 kg (11,766 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 125 is 14% heavier (657 kg / 1,448 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”AheadThe New Holland TM 125 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo has 150% more forward gears (36 gears) than the New Holland TM 125 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XT 910.6 Turbo and the TM 125.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”; OECD test report 1918, 2000EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20041999–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TM 125 has 141% more hydraulic flow (68.4 L/min / 18.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TM 125 is 14% heavier (657 kg / 1,448 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TM 125 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo has 150% more forward gears (36 gears) than the New Holland TM 125 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XT 910.6 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.6 Turbo: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”); the TM 125: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources