Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo or New Holland T 6030 RC/PC?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo and New Holland T 6030 RC/PC, with the call on each
QuestionXT 910.6 TurboT 6030 RC/PCCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?80.3 kW (107.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”81.6 kW (109.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XT 910.6 Turbo and the T 6030 RC/PC.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XT 910.6 Turbo and the T 6030 RC/PC.
Which pumps more oil for implements?48.5 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the T 6030 RC/PC.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,772 kg (10,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”8,257 kg (18,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.6 Turbo: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”); the T 6030 RC/PC: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,680 kg (10,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”6,075 kg (13,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 6030 RC/PC is 30% heavier (1,395 kg / 3,075 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the T 6030 RC/PC.
Which has the wider choice of gears?60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”18 to 19Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo has 216% more forward gears (41 gears) than the New Holland T 6030 RC/PC (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XT 910.6 Turbo and the T 6030 RC/PC.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T 6030 RC/PC.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20042007–2012Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 6030 RC/PC is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland T 6030 RC/PC is 30% heavier (1,395 kg / 3,075 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo has 216% more forward gears (41 gears) than the New Holland T 6030 RC/PC (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland T 6030 RC/PC is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.6 Turbo: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”); the T 6030 RC/PC: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6030 RC und PC”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources