Hürlimann XT 910.4 or Renault Temis 550?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Temis 550 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (8.7 L/min / 2.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann XT 910.4 and Renault Temis 550, with the call on each
QuestionXT 910.4Temis 550Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.7 kW (101.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”75.1 kW (100.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XT 910.4 and the Temis 550.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XT 910.4 and the Temis 550.
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”55.7 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”AheadThe Renault Temis 550 has 19% more hydraulic flow (8.7 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann XT 910.4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,375 kg (7,441 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”7,260 kg (16,006 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.4: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”); the Temis 550: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”5,340 kg (11,773 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 550 is 21% heavier (930 kg / 2,050 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?45 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the Renault Temis 550 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XT 910.4 and the Temis 550.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XT 910.4 and the Temis 550.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20042000–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 550 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Temis 550 has 19% more hydraulic flow (8.7 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann XT 910.4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Temis 550 is 21% heavier (930 kg / 2,050 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the Renault Temis 550 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Temis 550 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.4: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”); the Temis 550: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources