Hürlimann XT 910.4 or Renault 113-12 TX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 113-12 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann XT 910.4 and Renault 113-12 TX, with the call on each
QuestionXT 910.4113-12 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.7 kW (101.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 113-12 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XT 910.4 and the 113-12 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XT 910.4 and the 113-12 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”41.8 L/min (11.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 12% more hydraulic flow (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Renault 113-12 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,375 kg (7,441 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.4: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”); the 113-12 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”4,720 kg (10,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 113-12 TX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?45 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the Renault 113-12 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XT 910.4 and the 113-12 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XT 910.4 and the 113-12 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 113-12 TX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20041981–1986Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 12% more hydraulic flow (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Renault 113-12 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the Renault 113-12 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 113-12 TX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 113-12 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the XT 910.4: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4”); the 113-12 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources