Hürlimann XA 657 or New Holland TN 75 DA/SA?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland TN 75 DA/SA: hydraulic flow.
- The New Holland TN 75 DA/SA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 73% (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | XA 657 | TN 75 DA/SA | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.0 kW (63.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 47.4 kW (63.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XA 657 and the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XA 657 and the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 34.1 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 58.9 L/min (15.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | AheadThe New Holland TN 75 DA/SA has 73% more hydraulic flow (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Hürlimann XA 657 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XA 657: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”); the TN 75 DA/SA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 2,365 kg (5,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XA 657 is 12% heavier (295 kg / 650 lb) than the New Holland TN 75 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 16 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XA 657 and the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XA 657. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2004 | 2003–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TN 75 DA/SA has 73% more hydraulic flow (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Hürlimann XA 657 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XA 657 is 12% heavier (295 kg / 650 lb) than the New Holland TN 75 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the XA 657: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”); the TN 75 DA/SA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources