Hürlimann XA 657 or Lamborghini 574-70 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann XA 657 and Lamborghini 574-70 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionXA 657574-70 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.0 kW (63.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”46.9 kW (62.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XA 657 and the 574-70 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XA 657 and the 574-70 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.1 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XA 657: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”); the 574-70 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”2,140 kg (4,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XA 657 is 24% heavier (520 kg / 1,146 lb) than the Lamborghini 574-70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XA 657 and the 574-70 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XA 657.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2000–20041993–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XA 657 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann XA 657 is 24% heavier (520 kg / 1,146 lb) than the Lamborghini 574-70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XA 657 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the XA 657: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 657”); the 574-70 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 574-70 DT A Crono”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources