Hürlimann T-9200 (A) or VALMET 702 S (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the T-9200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 702 S (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VALMET 702 S (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | T-9200 (A) | 702 S (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 67.6 kW (90.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | 66.9 kW (89.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the T-9200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 702 S (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the T-9200 (A) and the 702 S (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the T-9200 (A) and the 702 S (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 52.0 L/min (13.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 702 S (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,475 kg (5,456 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T-9200 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,160 kg (6,967 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | 3,425 kg (7,551 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the T-9200 (A) and the 702 S (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T-9200 (A) and the 702 S (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | AheadThe VALMET 702 S (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann T-9200 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1050 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T-9200 (A) and the 702 S (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 702 S” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1979 | 1974–1979 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 702 S (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann T-9200 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the T-9200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 702 S (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources