Hürlimann T-9200 (A) vs Renault 921
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (2WD / 4WD; 2WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
9 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | T-9200 (A) | 921 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 90.7 hp | 90.8 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Hürlimann D-310 T | MWM D 227-6 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 4.95 L | 5.66 L | +14% 921 |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 249 lb·ft · 337 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Dry LuK double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 13.7 gpm · 52.0 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,987 psi · 206 bar | 2,321 psi · 160 bar | +29% T-9200 (A) |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 10,119 lb · 4,590 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1050 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,967 lb · 3,160 kg | 8,488 lb · 3,850 kg | +22% 921 |
| Wheelbase declared | 93.7 in · 2,380 mm | 105.0 in · 2,668 mm | +12% 921 |
| Length declared | 147.6 in · 3,750 mm | 172.5 in · 4,382 mm | +17% 921 |
| Width declared | 75.6 in · 1,920 mm | 77.0 in · 1,955 mm | — |
| Height declared | 74.8 in · 1,900 mm | 108.9 in · 2,765 mm | +46% 921 |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 17.1 in · 435 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 12.9 ft · 3.92 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 58.1 qt · 55.0 L | 123.6 qt · 117.0 L | +113% 921 |
Hürlimann T-9200 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-9200”
Renault 921 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 921 R7681”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”