Hürlimann T-5100 (A) or SAME Condor (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the T-5100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann T-5100 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann T-5100 (A) and SAME Condor (DT), with the call on each
QuestionT-5100 (A)Condor (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the T-5100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the T-5100 (A) and the Condor (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the T-5100 (A) and the Condor (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”AheadThe Hürlimann T-5100 (A) has 50% more hydraulic flow (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) than the SAME Condor (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the T-5100 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”); the Condor (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,270 kg (5,004 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”2,020 kg (4,453 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann T-5100 (A) is 12% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the SAME Condor (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the T-5100 (A) and the Condor (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T-5100 (A) and the Condor (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”AheadThe Hürlimann T-5100 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Condor (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T-5100 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19781978–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann T-5100 (A) has 50% more hydraulic flow (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) than the SAME Condor (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann T-5100 (A) is 12% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the SAME Condor (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann T-5100 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Condor (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the T-5100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the T-5100 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann T-5100”); the Condor (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 52 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources