Hürlimann XN-708 or New Holland TS 90 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the XN-708 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TS 90 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TS 90 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 116% (39.0 L/min / 10.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | XN-708 | TS 90 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XN-708 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TS 90 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XN-708 and the TS 90 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XN-708 and the TS 90 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 33.7 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 72.7 L/min (19.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | AheadThe New Holland TS 90 (A) has 116% more hydraulic flow (39.0 L/min / 10.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann XN-708 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 4,294 kg (9,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XN-708: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708”); the TS 90 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,520 kg (5,556 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 3,929 kg (8,662 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TS 90 (A) is 56% heavier (1,409 kg / 3,106 lb) than the Hürlimann XN-708 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the XN-708. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | AheadThe Hürlimann XN-708 has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the New Holland TS 90 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XN-708 and the TS 90 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XN-708. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708”; OECD test report 1812, 1999 | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1999–2003 | 1997–2003 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TS 90 (A) has 116% more hydraulic flow (39.0 L/min / 10.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann XN-708 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TS 90 (A) is 56% heavier (1,409 kg / 3,106 lb) than the Hürlimann XN-708 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XN-708 has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the New Holland TS 90 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XN-708 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TS 90 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the XN-708: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 708”); the TS 90 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS90”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources