Hürlimann XN-707 or John Deere 5410 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the John Deere 5410 (A): hydraulic flow. On features, the Hürlimann XN-707 is ahead on forward gears, top speed and PTO speeds.
- The Hürlimann XN-707 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The John Deere 5410 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 147% (36.7 L/min / 9.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Hürlimann XN-707 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | XN-707 | 5410 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.71 kW (65.32 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 48.8 kW (65.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XN-707 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XN-707 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 25.0 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 61.7 L/min (16.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe John Deere 5410 (A) has 147% more hydraulic flow (36.7 L/min / 9.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann XN-707 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,834 kg (4,043 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 1,640 kg (3,616 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XN-707: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707”); the 5410 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,455 kg (5,412 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 2,721 kg (5,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 5410 (A) is 11% heavier (266 kg / 586 lb) than the Hürlimann XN-707 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the XN-707 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 9 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe Hürlimann XN-707 has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XN-707 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe Hürlimann XN-707 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe Hürlimann XN-707 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5410 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XN-707. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707”; OECD test report 1822, 1999 | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2003 | 1997–2000 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 5410 (A) has 147% more hydraulic flow (36.7 L/min / 9.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann XN-707 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 5410 (A) is 11% heavier (266 kg / 586 lb) than the Hürlimann XN-707 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XN-707 has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XN-707 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XN-707 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5410 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the XN-707: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 707”); the 5410 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources