Hürlimann H-481 XF or Massey Ferguson MF 397 A?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-481 XF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 397 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-481 XF | MF 397 A | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-481 XF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 397 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-481 XF and the MF 397 A. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-481 XF and the MF 397 A. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 27.0 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 397 A. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,280 kg (5,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-481 XF: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”); the MF 397 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 3,890 kg (8,576 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 397A is 44% heavier (1,190 kg / 2,624 lb) than the Hürlimann H-481 XF (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-481 XF and the MF 397 A. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 397A has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Hürlimann H-481 XF (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-481 XF and the MF 397 A. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-481 XF and the MF 397 A. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–2000 | 1987–1994 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-481 XF is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 397A is 44% heavier (1,190 kg / 2,624 lb) than the Hürlimann H-481 XF (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 397A has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Hürlimann H-481 XF (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-481 XF is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-481 XF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 397 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-481 XF: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”); the MF 397 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources