Hürlimann H-481 XF or Massey Ferguson MF 393 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-481 XF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 393 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann H-481 XF suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-481 XF and Massey Ferguson MF 393 (A), with the call on each
QuestionH-481 XFMF 393 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-481 XF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 393 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-481 XF and the MF 393 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-481 XF and the MF 393 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.0 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 393 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,280 kg (5,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-481 XF: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”); the MF 393 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”2,920 kg (6,437 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-481 XF and the MF 393 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”AheadThe Hürlimann H-481 XF has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 393 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-481 XF and the MF 393 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”AheadThe Hürlimann H-481 XF has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 393 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-481 XF and the MF 393 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–20001987–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-481 XF is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-481 XF has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 393 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-481 XF has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 393 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-481 XF is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-481 XF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 393 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-481 XF: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XF 481”); the MF 393 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 393”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources