Hürlimann XB 110 MAX or Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the XB 110 MAX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1106 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (8.6 L/min / 2.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Hürlimann XB 110 MAX suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | XB 110 MAX | R.1106 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 80.2 kW (107.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 80.9 kW (108.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XB 110 MAX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1106 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XB 110 MAX and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XB 110 MAX and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 57.6 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | AheadThe Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) has 15% more hydraulic flow (8.6 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,300 kg (11,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,100 kg (9,039 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 4,340 kg (9,568 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 40Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XB 110 MAX and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | AheadThe Hürlimann XB 110 MAX has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XB 110 MAX and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2012–2015 | 2004– | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XB 110 MAX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) has 15% more hydraulic flow (8.6 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XB 110 MAX has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XB 110 MAX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XB 110 MAX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1106 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources