Hürlimann SX 1800 or Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the SX 1800 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann SX 1800 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 98% (56.0 L/min / 14.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann SX 1800 and Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler, with the call on each
QuestionSX 1800MB-trac 1800 intercoolerCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?132.4 kW (177.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”132 kW (177 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SX 1800 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the SX 1800 and the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the SX 1800 and the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which pumps more oil for implements?113.0 L/min (29.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”57.0 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”AheadThe Hürlimann SX 1800 has 98% more hydraulic flow (56.0 L/min / 14.8 gpm) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the SX 1800: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”); the MB-trac 1800 intercooler: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”6,350 kg (13,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann SX 1800 is 12% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the SX 1800 and the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”14Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”AheadThe Hürlimann SX 1800 has 29% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the SX 1800.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2000–20041990–1991Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann SX 1800 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann SX 1800 has 98% more hydraulic flow (56.0 L/min / 14.8 gpm) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1800 is 12% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1800 has 29% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1800 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SX 1800 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the SX 1800: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1800”); the MB-trac 1800 intercooler: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources