Hürlimann SX 1350 or VALMET 8350 HiTech?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the SX 1350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8350 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann SX 1350 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 43% (32.6 L/min / 8.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Hürlimann SX 1350 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann SX 1350 and VALMET 8350 HiTech, with the call on each
QuestionSX 13508350 HiTechCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?99.3 kW (133.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”99.3 kW (133.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SX 1350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8350 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the SX 1350 and the 8350 HiTech.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the SX 1350 and the 8350 HiTech.
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.0 L/min (28.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”76.4 L/min (20.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”AheadThe Hürlimann SX 1350 has 43% more hydraulic flow (32.6 L/min / 8.6 gpm) than the VALMET 8350 HiTech (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”5,720 kg (12,610 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann SX 1350 is 17% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the VALMET 8350 HiTech (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”AheadThe Hürlimann SX 1350 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the VALMET 8350 HiTech (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”AheadThe VALMET 8350 HiTech has 33% more forward gears (9 gears) than the Hürlimann SX 1350 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the SX 1350 and the 8350 HiTech.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8350 HiTech.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350 HiTech”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20041998–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann SX 1350 has 43% more hydraulic flow (32.6 L/min / 8.6 gpm) than the VALMET 8350 HiTech (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1350 is 17% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the VALMET 8350 HiTech (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1350 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the VALMET 8350 HiTech (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 8350 HiTech has 33% more forward gears (9 gears) than the Hürlimann SX 1350 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SX 1350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8350 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources