Hürlimann SX 1350 or SAME Rubin 135?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME Rubin 135: three-point lift.

  • The SAME Rubin 135 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann SX 1350 and SAME Rubin 135, with the call on each
QuestionSX 1350Rubin 135Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?103.2 kW (138.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”103.2 kW (138.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the SX 1350 and the Rubin 135.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the SX 1350 and the Rubin 135.
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.0 L/min (28.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”103.0 L/min (27.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”AheadThe SAME Rubin 135 has 23% more lift (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Hürlimann SX 1350 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the SX 1350 and the Rubin 135.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1350”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20041998–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Rubin 135 has 23% more lift (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Hürlimann SX 1350 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources