Hürlimann SX 1200 or Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the SX 1200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 630 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Hürlimann SX 1200 suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (2,345 kg / 5,170 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | SX 1200 | Ares 630 RX/RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SX 1200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 630 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the SX 1200 and the Ares 630 RX/RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the SX 1200 and the Ares 630 RX/RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 59.9 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the SX 1200. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ has 21% more lift (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Hürlimann SX 1200 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 5,496 kg (12,117 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann SX 1200 is 11% heavier (604 kg / 1,332 lb) than the Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 8,155 kg (17,979 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Hürlimann SX 1200 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (2,345 kg / 5,170 lb) than the Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the SX 1200 and the Ares 630 RX/RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2004 | 1996–2002 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ has 21% more lift (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Hürlimann SX 1200 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann SX 1200 is 11% heavier (604 kg / 1,332 lb) than the Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann SX 1200 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (2,345 kg / 5,170 lb) than the Renault Ares 630 RX/RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SX 1200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 630 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources