Hürlimann H-6170 (A) or Lamborghini R-1706 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-6170 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1706 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-6170 (A) and Lamborghini R-1706 DT, with the call on each
QuestionH-6170 (A)R-1706 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?121.4 kW (162.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”121.4 kW (162.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-6170 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1706 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-6170 (A) and the R-1706 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-6170 (A) and the R-1706 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?64.0 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-6170 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,120 kg (13,492 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-1706 DT.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,650 kg (14,661 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-6170 (A) is 15% heavier (850 kg / 1,874 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1706 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-1706 DT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”24 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6170 (A) and the R-1706 DT.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6170”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1706 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19911983–1994EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-6170 (A) is 15% heavier (850 kg / 1,874 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1706 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-6170 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1706 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources