Hürlimann H-80 XA or ZETOR Proxima 90 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 90 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (16.4 L/min / 4.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-80 XA | Proxima 90 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 90 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-80 XA and the Proxima 90 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-80 XA and the Proxima 90 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 48.3 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | AheadThe ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) has 51% more hydraulic flow (16.4 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Proxima 90 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) is 16% heavier (450 kg / 992 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 30 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-80 XA has 50% more forward gears (10 gears) than the ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-80 XA and the Proxima 90 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-80 XA and the Proxima 90 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 90” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2009–2014 | 2010–2014 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) has 51% more hydraulic flow (16.4 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) is 16% heavier (450 kg / 992 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-80 XA has 50% more forward gears (10 gears) than the ZETOR Proxima 90 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 90 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources