Hürlimann H-80 XA or URSUS 6012/6014?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6012/6014 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The URSUS 6012/6014 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 92% (29.4 L/min / 7.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Hürlimann H-80 XA suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-80 XA and URSUS 6012/6014, with the call on each
QuestionH-80 XA6012/6014Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6012/6014 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-80 XA and the 6012/6014.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-80 XA and the 6012/6014.
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”AheadThe URSUS 6012/6014 has 92% more hydraulic flow (29.4 L/min / 7.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”3,781 kg (8,336 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-80 XA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”); the 6012/6014: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”3,340 kg (7,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 6012/6014 is 15% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6012/6014.
Which has the wider choice of gears?30 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”AheadThe Hürlimann H-80 XA has 150% more forward gears (18 gears) than the URSUS 6012/6014 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-80 XA and the 6012/6014.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”AheadThe Hürlimann H-80 XA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 6012/6014 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-80 XA.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2009–20141997–2009Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-80 XA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The URSUS 6012/6014 has 92% more hydraulic flow (29.4 L/min / 7.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 6012/6014 is 15% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-80 XA has 150% more forward gears (18 gears) than the URSUS 6012/6014 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-80 XA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 6012/6014 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-80 XA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6012/6014 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-80 XA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”); the 6012/6014: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources