Hürlimann H-76 XA or John Deere 2400 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The John Deere 2400 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 25% (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 34% (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Hürlimann H-76 XA suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-76 XA and John Deere 2400 (A), with the call on each
QuestionH-76 XA2400 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?54.4 kW (73.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”54.5 kW (73.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-76 XA and the 2400 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-76 XA and the 2400 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”AheadThe John Deere 2400 (A) has 25% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”4,020 kg (8,863 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”AheadThe John Deere 2400 (A) has 34% more lift (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2400 (A) is 19% heavier (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”20Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2400 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”AheadThe Hürlimann H-76 XA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 2400 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-76 XA and the 2400 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20091993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-76 XA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 2400 (A) has 25% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2400 (A) has 34% more lift (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2400 (A) is 19% heavier (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-76 XA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 2400 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-76 XA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources